EFL SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THEIR INTERACTIONS IN COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE

Authors

  • Trần Hồng Cảnh
  • Nguyễn Duy Khang

Keywords

EFL secondary school teachers, Perceptions, Communities of practice, Interactions, Professional development, Giáo viên tiếng Anh bậc trung học, Nhận thức, Cộng đồng thực hành chuyên môn, Tương tác, Sự phát triển nghề nghiệp

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.14906

Abstract

This study investigates EFL secondary school teachers’ perceptions of the significance of their interactions in the Communities of Practice. The study employed an exploratory sequential mixed-method design, grounded in Situated Learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991) and Dialogical Self (Hermans, 2001) Theories. To ensure integration, a nested sampling design was utilized, involving 100 randomly selected EFL teachers from a population of 1,469 in Dong Thap province. From this group, eight participants were sub-selected through convenient sampling for in-depth interviews. The procedure followed a building approach, where initial qualitative themes established the framework for a 15-item, online 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. Thematic analysis was utilized to look at qualitative responses, while IBM SPSS Statistics 20 was employed to analyze quantitative data for descriptive statistics. The findings showed that the participants’ interactions in Communities of Practice were significantly recognized in boosting their pedagogical knowledge development, figuring out measures for their classroom critical incidents, and enhancing their desires for further education. To scrutinize, professional interactions catalyze EFL teachers’ development; thus, fostering interactive environments enhances both the quality of teaching and their career path.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ministry of Education and Training (MOET), General Education curriculum - English Curriculum, promulgated via Circular No. 32, Dec. 26, 2018, 2018.

Ministry of Education and Training (MOET), Competency Framework for English Language Teachers: User’s Guide. Vietnam Education Publishing House, 2012.

A. Kennedy, “Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis,” Professional Development in Education, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 336–351, 2014, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.929293.

E. Wenger, R. McDermott, and W. M. Snyder, A Guide to Managing Knowledge: Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.

T. Brown, “Situated learning theory of Lave and Wenger,” 2013. [Online]. Available: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3-euw1-ap-pe-ws4-cws-documents.ri-prod/9780415829496/T10.pdf. [Accessed Apr. 10, 2026].

P. Hildreth and C. Kimble, "Dualities, distributed communities of practice and knowledge management," Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 102–113, 2005, doi: 10.1108/13673270510610369.

P. Eckert and S. McConnell-Ginet, “Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice,” Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 461–488, 1992, doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333.

J. W. Hur and T. A. Brush, “Teacher participation in online communities,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 279–303, 2009, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782532.

H. D. Brown, Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. White Plains, NY, USA: Pearson Education, 2007.

E. D. Wagner, “In support of a functional definition of interaction,” American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 6–29, 1994, doi: 10.1080/08923649409526852.

R. J. Simpson and J. J. Galbo, “Interaction and learning: Theorizing on the art of teaching,” Interchange, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 37–51, 1986, doi: 10.1007/BF01807015.

C. Howe, Gender and Classroom Interaction. Glasgow, U.K.: SCRE Publication, 1997.

G. R. Daniel, G. Auhl, and W. Hastings, “Collaborative feedback and reflection for professional growth: Preparing first‐year pre‐service teachers for participation in the community of practice,” Asia‐Pacific J. Teacher Educ., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 159–172, 2013, doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2013.777025.

P. Grossman, S. Wineburg, and S. Woolworth, “Toward a theory of teacher community,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 942–1012, 2001, doi: 10.1111/0161-4681.00140.

J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

R. Arnell, “Teacher beliefs on personal learning, collaboration, and participation in virtual communities of practice,” Doctoral thesis, Walden University, USA, 2014.

H. Han and J. Wang, “Teacher learning community and EFL teacher professional development,” International Journal of Learning and Teaching, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 2021, doi: 10.18178/ijlt.7.1.54-58.

M. Kowalczuk-Walędziak and J. M. Underwood, “International communities of practice: What makes them successful vehicles for teachers’ professional development?,” Educational Studies, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 973–990, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2021.1927673.

P. Murugaiah, H. Azman, S. M. Thang, and P. Krish, “Teacher learning via communities of practice: A Malaysian case study,” International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 162–174, 2012, doi: 10.5172/ijpl.2012.7.2.162.

S. Xue, X. Hu, X. Chi, and J. Zhang, “Building an online community of practice through WeChat for teacher professional learning,” Professional Development in Education, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 613–637, 2019, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2019.1647273.

D. B. Nguyen, H. Q. Nguyen, and T. T. Le, “EFL teachers’ perceptions of professional development activities and their effects in a non-anglosphere context,” Focus on ELT Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 70–86, 2022, doi: 10.14744/felt.2022.4.2.5.

Q. N. Phan, “Professional learning communities: Learning sites for primary school English language teachers in Vietnam,” Doctoral thesis, University Technol. Sydney, Australia, 2017.

T. D. H. Tran, “A community of practice and its influence on Vietnamese EFL teachers' professional identities,” Doctoral thesis, Victoria Univ. Wellington, New Zealand, 2022, doi: 10.26686/wgtn.21101797.

T. D. Tran and Q. T. Nguyen, “Barriers preventing EFL teachers from participating and constructing communities of practice,” European Journal of Foreign language Teaching, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 159–180, 2022, doi: 10.46827/ejfl.v6i2.4405.

J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2018.

H. J. M. Hermans, “The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning,” Cult. Psychol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 243–281, 2001, doi: 10.1177/1354067X0173001.

A. J. Onwuegbuzie and N. L. Leech, “Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public,” The Qualitative Report, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 238–254, 2007, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1636.

Z. Dörnyei and T. Taguchi, Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2009.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-16

Issue

Section

EDUCATIONAL SCIENCE