ÁP LỰC THỂ CHẾ VÀ QUYẾT ĐỊNH TRIỂN KHAI LOGISTICS THU HỒI: BẰNG CHỨNG THỰC NGHIỆM TỪ DOANH NGHIỆP FDI TẠI CÁC KHU CÔNG NGHIỆP HẢI PHÒNG (INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES AND REVERSE LOGISTICS ADOPTION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM FDI ENTERPRISES IN HAI PHONG INDUSTRIAL ZONES)
Từ khóa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65154/jmst.920Tóm tắt
Trong bối cảnh gia tăng áp lực chuyển đổi xanh và trách nhiệm mở rộng của doanh nghiệp (EPR), nghiên cứu này nhằm kiểm định mô hình lý thuyết về các yếu tố thúc đẩy logistics thu hồi tại doanh nghiệp FDI trong các khu công nghiệp Hải Phòng. Dữ liệu được thu thập từ 446 cán bộ quản lý thông qua bảng hỏi trực tuyến, sử dụng thang đo Likert 5 điểm và phân tích bằng mô hình SEM. Kết quả chỉ ra rằng các áp lực từ tập đoàn mẹ, khách hàng quốc tế, công nghệ, khu công nghiệp và pháp lý đều tác động tích cực đến mức độ thực hiện logistics thu hồi. Nghiên cứu góp phần mở rộng lý thuyết thể chế và các bên liên quan, đồng thời cung cấp hàm ý thiết thực cho quản trị chuỗi cung ứng bền vững.AbstractIn the context of increasing pressure for green transformation and extended corporate responsibility (EPR), this study aims to test a theoretical model of factors promoting reverse logistics in FDI enterprises in Hai Phong industrial zones. Data were collected from 446 managers through an online questionnaire, using a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed using SEM model. The results indicate that pressures from parent corporations, international customers, technology, industrial zones and legal frameworks all have positive impacts on the level of reverse logistics implementation. The study contributes to the expansion of institutional and stakeholder theories, and provides practical implications for sustainable supply chain management.Keywords: Reverse Logistics, Regulatory Pressure, International Customer Pressure, Parent Company Pressure, Technological Pressure.Lượt tải
Tài liệu tham khảo
[1] P. J. DiMaggio and W. W. Powell (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, Vol.48, No.2, pp.147-160.
[2] S. Sarkis, L. M. Meade, and S. Talluri (2020). Sustainable supply chain management: A review and research agenda, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.250, pp.119-131.
[3] K. Govindan and H. Soleimani (2017). A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: A global perspective, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol.64, pp.162-181.
[4] World Bank (2023). Toward Circular Economy in Vietnam: Environmental Policy and EPR Implementation Report. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.
[5] F. Testa, F. Iraldo, M. Frey, and T. Daddi (2020). The effect of environmental regulation on firms’ competitive performance: The case of the registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals (REACH), Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol.19, No.8, pp.512-522.
[6] M. Christmann and G. Taylor (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self‐regulation in China, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.32, No.3, pp.439-458.
[7] A. Kolk (2006). Corporate social responsibility and international business: Examining multinational corporations, Journal of World Business, Vol.41, No.1, pp.51-57.
[8] R. E. Freeman (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA, USA: Pitman.
[9] M. Pagell and Z. Wu (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol.45, No.2, pp.37-56.
[10] S. Gold, S. Seuring, and P. Beske (2010). Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol.17, No.4, pp.230-245.
[11] UNIDO, World Bank, and GIZ (2017). An International Framework for Eco-Industrial Parks. Washington, DC, USA: UNIDO.
[12] UNIDO (2019). Eco-Industrial Parks in Viet Nam: A Review of International and Vietnamese Experiences. Vienna, Austria: UNIDO.
[13] World Bank (2019). Vietnam Industrial Pollution Management Project: Implementation Completion and Results Report (Report No. ICR00004702). Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.
[14] World Bank (2022). Vietnam Country Climate and Development Report. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.
[15] M. Tornatzky and M. Fleischer (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington, MA, USA: Lexington Books.
[16] Q. Zhu and J. Sarkis (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises, Journal of Operations Management, Vol.22, No.3, pp.265-289.
[17] S. K. Mukherjee and R. B. Mondal (2020). RFID and traceability systems in supply chains: A review of applications and impacts, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol.155, p. 104658.
[18] World Bank (2022). Vietnam Country Climate and Development Report. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.
[19] M. E. Porter and C. van der Linde (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.9, No.4, pp.97-118.
[20] V. D. R. Guide and L. N. Van Wassenhove (2009). The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research, Operations Research, Vol.57, No.1, pp.10-18.
[21] Quốc hội nước CHXHCN Việt Nam (2020).
