RESEARCH ON THE FLIPPED CLASSROOM IN MODERN EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

DOI: 10.18173/2354-1075.2026-0014

Abstract

Drawing on an analysis of the historical development and dissemination of the flipped classroom (FC), this study argues that the FC is the product of multiple educational theories. The article examines four theoretical strands: constructivism and social constructivism; cognitive load theory and multimedia learning; active and experiential learning; and Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive objectives to explain the mechanisms underlying the phases of the FC. It also identifies practical challenges, including misconceptions during self-study when timely support is lacking, cognitive overload resulting from suboptimally designed materials, difficulties in coordinating group activities, and constraints on achieving higher-order thinking when learners’ preparation is insufficient. The analysis suggests that the effectiveness of the FC depends on alignment between theoretical foundations, pedagogical design, and implementation conditions. The study calls for clearer principles of material design, cognitive load management, and quality assurance in classroom coordination to support a cautious and well-grounded adoption of the FC in higher education.